Britain may suffer
from missed opportunities if it fails to grasp Kazakhstan’s
growing importance
It will not have escaped the notice of observers of
Central Asian affairs that the US has upgraded relations
with Kazakhstan to a new level, notably through a series
of visits by high-level politicians and officials to
Astana over the last twelve months, most recently including
the Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice and the vice-president
Richard Cheney. And in September, President Nursultan
Nazarbayev will travel to Washington where a wide-ranging
“strategic partnership accord” is expected
to be signed between the two countries.
In contrast, there has been no stream of senior British
politicians to Kazakhstan - despite some warm words
about the future of relations between Kazakhstan and
Britain by the British Prime Minister in 2002 and despite
the fact that Britain has been the biggest European
investor in Kazakhstan since it achieved independence
fifteen years ago. Britain has also been slow to move
its embassy to the new capital of Astana, even if Paul
Brummel, the new British ambassador to Kazakhstan, has
moved rapidly to organise the transfer since taking
up his post in December.
In Occasional Paper No. 15, called “Are
Britain’s politicians slow to grasp Kazakhstan’s
growing importance?”, the Caspian Information
Centre looks at some of the reasons for suggesting that
in Britain’s own interests it should take Kazakhstan
more seriously; and it raises the question that it may
pay a significant price in terms of lost opportunites
if it fails to do so.
|